The Rape of the Text

The Rape of the Text

Reading and Misreading Pope's Essay on Man

eBook - 1993
Rate this:
Chicago Distribution Center

The Rape of the Text deconstructs the history of criticism for An Essay on Man to account for and to reverse over two hundred years of deformation and trivialization of Pope’s text by literary critics, philosophers, and historians of ideas.


Normal0falsefalsefalseMicrosoftInternetExplorer4

First published in 1733-1734, An Essay on Man, Alexander Pope’s best-known philosophical poem, was highly praised by many of Pope’s European contemporaries, including Voltaire, Rousseau, Kant, and Hume. The poem, divided into four Epistles, deals with the nature of man and his place in the universe, man as an individual, man in society, and man in pursuit of happiness.
Voltaire called An Essay on Man “the most beautiful, most useful, most sublime didactic poem” in the English language, but what was formerly regarded as the pinnacle of 18th-century poetry now languishes largely unread or misread as a quaint period piece. In contrast, Harold Bloom recently described the Essay as a “poetic disaster” of “absurd theodicy.”The Rape of the Text deconstructs the history of criticism for An Essay on Man to account for and to reverse over two hundred years of deformation and trivialization of Pope’s text by literary critics, philosophers, and historians of ideas. After showing why the commonplaces about the Essay inscribed in Pope scholarship are suspect because of the mutual and abiding hostility of logocentric and aesthetic traditions of misreading, Solomon rebuts the objections made to Pope’s “philosophy” in a series of chapters demonstrating more appropriate strategies for interpreting Pope’s persona, tone, methodology, argument, and figurality. Cumulatively the chapters characterize a discourse work of “middle-state” Academic Skepticism that Pope shared with his admirers.
Although the characterization of Pope’s discourse world in The Rape of the Text has implications for Pope and for 18th-century scholarship beyond theEssay on Man, it also has implications for reading all philosophical poetry. Solomon contends that criticism of theEssay on Man is only an extreme example of the deformation that occurs routinely when literary critics or philosopher interpret philosophical poetry, and in the final chapter he calls for a “naturalization” of philosophical poetry as a genre as the necessary remedy to our present willful blindness.


Book News
Solomon (English, Auburn U.) deconstructs the two centuries of criticism of Pope's long philosophical poem, which was loved by his contemporaries, and has been denigrated and trivialized by recent critics. He concludes that literary critics should not try to interpret philosophy. Annotation copyright Book News, Inc. Portland, Or.

Blackwell North Amer
First published in 1733-1734, An Essay on Man, Alexander Pope's best-known philosophical poem was highly praised by many of Pope's European contemporaries, including Voltaire, Rousseau and Hume. The poem, divided into four Epistles, deals with the nature of man and his place in the universe, man as an individual, man in society, and man in pursuit of happiness.
Voltaire called An Essay on Man "the most beautiful, most useful, most sublime didactic poem" in the English language, but what was formerly regarded as the pinnacle of 18th-century poetry now languishes largely unread or misread as a quaint period piece. Harold Bloom recently described the Essay as a "poetic disaster" of "absurd theodicy." The Rape of the Text deconstructs the history of criticism of An Essay on Man to account for and to reverse over two hundred years of deformation and trivialization of Pope's text by literary critics, philosophers, and historians of ideas.
After showing why the commonplaces about the Essay inscribed in Pope scholarship are suspect because of the mutual and abiding hostility of logocentric and aesthetic traditions of misreading, Solomon rebuts the objections made to Pope's "philosophy" in a series of chapters demonstrating more appropriate strategies for interpreting Pope's persona, tone, methodology, argument, and figurality. Cumulatively, the chapters characterize a discourse world of "middle-state" Academic Skepticism that Pope shared with his admirers.
While the characterization of Pope's discourse world in The Rape of the Text has implications for Pope and for 18th-century scholarship beyond the Essay on Man, it also has implications for reading all philosophical poetry. Solomon contends that criticism of the Essay on Man is only an extreme example of the deformation that occurs routinely when literary critics or philosophers interpret philosophical poetry, and in the final chapter he calls for a "naturalization" of philosophical poetry as a genre as the necessary remedy to our present willful blindness.

Publisher: Tuscaloosa, Ala. : University of Alabama Press, ©1993
ISBN: 9780585163048
0585163049
Characteristics: 1 online resource (245 pages)

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

There are no comments for this title yet.

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at PPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top